Skip to content
Portfolio control

A loss is a signal that was watched too late.

Early WarningContinuous, not quarterlyBuilt on Sinergy

Early Warning reads financial and behavioural signals continuously against the live portfolio, ranks what has actually changed, and turns it into an intervention someone owns — with a date, an action and an outcome recorded against the asset.

The monitoring problem

Quarterly review is an accounting rhythm, not a risk one.

Businesses deteriorate on their own schedule. By the time a periodic review notices, the options that were cheap — a restructure, a limit reduction, a conversation — have usually expired, and what is left is a provision.

What it does

Everything that moved, down to the one thing to do today.

Detecting a threshold breach is the easy part. The narrowing below is the hard part — and the two boxes at the bottom are what the process leaves behind, which is the part a securitisation investor eventually asks about.

What comes in

FinancialFilings, ratios and cash-flow volatility
BehaviouralUtilisation and payment timing
SectorContext around the counterparty's market
RegistryFiling and ownership changes
Tracked continuously against every live exposure
SignalsFinancial and behavioural

Utilisation, payment timing, cash-flow volatility, sector context and filing changes are tracked as a live set rather than a periodic snapshot.

Weighted by exposure, so a small team can work a large book
RankingSeverity, not volume

Signals are scored against the exposure they sit on, so a small change on a large limit outranks a large change on a small one.

What survives the cut, held under stated rules
WatchlistsA list that means something

Assets move on and off watch under stated rules, with the reason and the reviewer recorded each time.

What actually reaches a person
InterventionAn action with an owner

Every escalation produces a task, a deadline and an outcome written back to the credit record.

And two things the process leaves behind

Portfolio viewConcentration and drift

Sector, counterparty and vintage concentration are visible against limits before they become a covenant conversation.

EvidenceWhat was known, and when

The signal history behind any decision is preserved — which is exactly what a securitisation investor and an auditor both ask for.

How it runs

Signal to outcome, with nothing lost in between.

01Observe

Behavioural, transactional and external feeds update against every live exposure.

02Detect

Rules and thresholds fire where a pattern has genuinely changed, not merely moved.

03Rank

Alerts are weighted by exposure and severity so a team of five can work a portfolio of thousands.

04Act

The escalation becomes an owned task with a deadline inside Credit Lifecycle.

05Record

The outcome returns to the asset and to the next model calibration.

Where it sits

The control layer over a live book.

It reads the record Credit Lifecycle maintains, uses the views Scoring Engines produce, and supplies the performance evidence a pool is later tranched against.

01Data02Underwriting03Operate04Control05Structure06Distribute
Deployment

Point it at a portfolio you already hold.

Standalone

Over an existing book

Early Warning can monitor a portfolio serviced elsewhere, through defined interfaces, without moving the servicing.

Thresholds

Your risk appetite

Signals, weights and escalation rules are configured by the risk team and versioned like any other policy.

Workflow

Into your queues

Escalations can be raised into the institution's own task and case systems rather than a second inbox.

Questions

The ones that come up first.

How is this different from a rules engine we already have?

The difference is ranking and ownership. Detecting a threshold breach is the easy part; deciding which of two hundred breaches a small team should work today, and recording what was done, is the part that changes realised loss.

Does it need transactional data?

It works on repayment behaviour and financial updates alone, and gets substantially better with transactional feeds. Most deployments start with the former.

What does this have to do with securitisation?

A pool is tranched against expected loss. Evidence that deterioration was caught early and acted on is what lets a structure carry less enhancement for the same rating proxy.

Is this the same as FiveEye?

No. FiveEye monitors financial-crime risk — screening, AML, transaction monitoring. Early Warning monitors credit risk. They run on the same platform and answer to different regulators.

Early Warning

Bring the portfolio and the last four provisions.

The useful question is whether the signals were there before the loss was.

Request a demo